is written to help authors, business owners, and non-profits
spread their message like wildfire.
Social media was meant to be social, not commercial. That's
why readers don't appreciate publishers attempting to infiltrate their social
networks. Trying to advertise books to a social network group is like
interrupting a meaningful church service with advertisements to sell Bibles. The
pitch is in bad taste and out of context, which only makes the congregation mad
and distrustful.Likewise, I find it hard to believe that the average reader wants to spend much time on a publisher's FaceBook page or Twitter feed. That doesn't line up with the definition of social interaction. This truth is backed up by a survey of 21,000 book shoppers where the majority said they ignore big publisher websites in favor of visiting author websites. This preference is due to the desire that readers want to build relationships with their favorite authors, rather than a large impersonal company. Thus, publishers would get better return on investment by empowering their authors to maximize social networks, rather than wasting money and manpower building a corporate social media presence.
How can publishers assist their authors to maximize social networks? Help authors create value-laden, word-of-mouth tools that can quickly spread through the social networks, such as free resources, viral videos, contests, coupons, sample chapters, etc. Give authors the tools to be the life of the online party in their own social networks. Happy author, happy readers...happy publisher.
To receive Rob's "Monday Morning Marketing Tips" directly to your email Inbox, click here




As a marketing consultant, I worked with numerous leaders
who work in academic circles, such as counselors, professors, pastors, and
specialty book publishers. A common problem among these scholastic groups is the
tendency to believe that their marketing should be exempt from the need to
answer the consumers' primary question, "What's in it for me?" Appealing to a
person's felt need is viewed as stooping to a lower level of
commerce.
The more you rely on technology to spread your message, the
more you must be brief. We live in a world of smaller screens, smaller attention
spans, and smaller conversations where media platforms continuously shrink
discussions. For instance, radio and TV interviews these days are typically no
longer 3 - 6 minutes. And, social media tools, like Twitter, limit your remarks
to just 140 characters.
Recently, I was driving through downtown 
